one of the most controversial elements of the recent Fisheries Amendment Bill. LegaSea and our partners remain determined to keep this sleeping giant at bay because if implemented, proportionality will change the way we fish forever. Currently, the Minister must first decide the total amount of a fish species that can be caught in an area each year. This is the Total Allowable Catch (TAC). From that total, the TAC is divided up between different interests, starting with an allowance for what non- commercial fishers are likely to catch; this covers Māori customary and recreational interests, and an estimate of fish that die because of fishing. These allowances enable people to provide for their social, economic and cultural wellbeing through gathering kaimoana. Once these allowances are set aside, any fish remaining can be allocated to commercial fishers as the Total Allowable Commercial Catch (TACC). If nothing is left, the TACC can be set at zero. Proportionality would flip this system on its head. Instead of a flexible allowance, we would be given a fixed allocation - a set amount of fish, a set share of the TAC. If a commercial fisher exceeds their allocation, they either must source more catching rights or pay a penalty fine. It’s not clear what penalties could be imposed on recreational fishers if our collective allocation is exceeded. It may mean more cuts to daily bag limits or restricting fishing seasons or areas. Under proportionality, the Minister’s statutory obligation to determine a reasonable allowance that will provide for our well beings would be gone. With our minimal collective resources, we would be reduced to arguing for the leftovers in a broken Quota Management System. Yet, earlier Court rulings have made it clear that proportional allocation is not mandatory. LegaSea views fish as a natural, public resource for Kiwis to catch to help feed their families and this should remain that way. Photo – Karena Kaihe-Woolston /FISHINGINGODZONE 41
View this content as a flipbook by clicking here.